AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs XFX Radeon R9 Nano 4gb (R9-FURY-4SF6)
Theoretical performance comparison
Real-world game, 3D graphics and compute performance depends on several graphics card parameters, including texture fillrate, pixel fillrate, memory bandwidth, single-precision performance and double-precision performance. Below we explain why these characteristics are important and which card has better specs.
Pixel fill rate (gigapixels/s)
80 64 48 32 16 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Pixel fillrate parameter shows how many pixels a graphics card can draw on screen and off screen. The higher this number, the higher maximum display resolution and frame rate the graphics card can support. The maximum pixel fillrate is proportional to the number of ROPs and graphics frequency. Since both characteristics are identical between graphics cards, their pixel fillrate is also equal.
- AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- XFX Radeon R9 Nano 4gb
Texture fill rate (gigatexels/s)
300 240 180 120 60 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Because two models have the same number of Texture Mapping Units and the same graphics clock rate, their texture fillrate is identical.
Single Precision performance (GFLOPS)
10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Maximum Single Precision performance indicates how good the GPU is at executing applications, that process only single-precision floating point data. The performance is expressed in billions of Floating Point Operations Per Second, or GFLOPS. As a rule, the more stream processors or CUDA cores the card has, and the the faster they operate at, the better Single Precision performance will be. These two graphics cards have the same single-precision performance.
Double Precision performance (GFLOPS)
600 480 360 240 120 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Similar to Single Precision performance, Double Precision one also provides the maximum number of floating-point operations, executed by stream processors or CUDA cores, but it refers to double precision (64-bit) operations. Both GPUs have the same performance.
- AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- XFX Radeon R9 Nano 4gb
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)
600 480 360 240 120 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Memory bandwidth of both graphics units is identical.
Specs comparison
All rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
General information | ||
| Market segment | Desktop | |
| Manufacturer | AMD | XFX |
| Model | Radeon R9 Nano | Radeon R9 Nano 4gb |
| Part number | R9-FURY- | |
| Based on | N/A | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
Architecture / Interface | ||
| Die name | ||
| Architecture | ||
| Fabrication process | ||
| Bus interface | ||
Cores / shaders | ||
| Compute units | ||
| Color ROPs | ||
| Stream processors | ||
| Pixel fill rate | ||
| Texture units | ||
| Texture fill rate | ||
| Single Precision performance | ||
| Double Precision performance | ||
Clocks / Memory | ||
| Graphics clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory size | 4096 MB | |
| Memory type | HBM | |
| Memory clock | ||
| Memory interface width | ||
| Memory bandwidth | ||
Other features | ||
| Maximum crossfire options | ||
| Maximum power | ||
Better values / features are marked with green color, and worse values are in red color.
Detailed specifications:
Compare graphics cards
More comparisons
Compare AMD Radeon R9 Nano:
Compare XFX Radeon R9 Nano 4gb: