ELSA GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Theoretical performance comparison
Real-world game, 3D graphics and compute performance depends on several essential GPU parameters, including pixel fillrate, texture fillrate, memory bandwidth, single-precision performance and double-precision performance. Below we explain why these characteristics are important and which card has better specs.
Pixel fill rate (gigapixels/s)
20 16 12 8 4 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Because it has 4 times as many ROPs, the ELSA GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB graphics unit provides significantly higher pixel fill rate, even though its graphics frequency is lower. Having better pixel fillrate allows the GPU to draw more pixels on screen and off screen, which is beneficial for some 3D effects in games, or when playing at higher display resolutions.
- ELSA GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB
- NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
Texture fill rate (gigatexels/s)
30 24 18 12 6 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Even though it has slower graphics clock, the ELSA GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB card comes with 3 times as many Texture Mapping Units (TMUs), resulting in substantially better texture fill rate. Having better maximum texture fill rate allows the GPU to use more complex 3D effects and/or apply more textures to each textured picture element, which improves visual appearance of games and generated images.
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)
90 72 54 36 18 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Memory bandwidth parameter specifies how much memory (in Gigabytes) the graphics card can read from or write to dedicated memory per second. Cards with higher memory bandwidth have better performance at high display resolutions, or when using large and detailed textures, and/or utilizing complex 3D effects and filters, like anti-aliasing. The bandwidth is dependent on memory type, speed, and memory interface width. Specifically, the GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB graphics card has wider memory bus. As a consequence, it has more memory bandwidth.
Specs comparison
All rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
General information | ||
Market segment | Desktop | |
Manufacturer | ELSA | NVIDIA |
Model | GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB | GeForce 8600 GT |
Based on | NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 | N/A |
Architecture / Interface | ||
Die name | ||
Architecture | ||
Fabrication process | ||
Bus interface | ||
Cores / shaders | ||
CUDA cores | ||
ROPs | ||
Pixel shader processors | ||
Pixel fill rate | ||
Vertex shader processors | ||
Vertex Fill rate | ||
Texture units | ||
Texture fill rate | ||
Single Precision performance | ||
Clocks / Memory | ||
Graphics clock | 500 MHz | 540 MHz |
Processor clock | 1188 MHz | |
Memory size | 1024 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Memory clock | ||
Memory interface width | ||
Memory bandwidth | ||
Other features | ||
Maximum SLI options |
Better values / features are marked with green color, and worse values are in red color.
Detailed specifications:
Compare graphics cards
More comparisons
Compare ELSA GLADIAC 979 GX2 1GB:
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT: