Inno3D GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X2 vs iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3
Theoretical performance comparison
Real-world game, 3D graphics and compute performance is dependent on several graphics card parameters, including pixel fillrate, texture fillrate, memory bandwidth, single-precision performance and double-precision performance. Below you will find why they are important, and which GPU has better characteristics.
Pixel fill rate (gigapixels/s)
100 80 60 40 20 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
The maximum pixel fillrate is calculated as the number of ROPs, multiplied by graphics clock speed. The iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3 has almost no lead here, as it operates at insignificantly higher rate, and both GPUs have identical number of Raster Operations Pipelines. Better maximum pixel fill rate allows more pixels to be drawn on screen per second, which results in increased GPU performance, unless there are bottlenecks somewhere else.
- Inno3D GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X2
- Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3
Texture fill rate (gigatexels/s)
200 160 120 80 40 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Another important factor, that affects overall card performance, is texture fillrate. This parameter is defined as the number of TMUs (Texture Mapping Units), multiplied by graphics frequency. Since two cards have the same number of TMUs, and the Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3 is clocked slightly higher, it also has higher texture fillrate. Better texture fill rate allows the graphics card to apply more textures and/or use more sophisticated 3D effects for each textured picture element, which improves visual appearance of games and generated images.
Single Precision performance (GFLOPS)
6000 4800 3600 2400 1200 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Maximum Single Precision performance shows how many single-precision floating point operations the GPU can execute per second. The performance is measured in billions of Floating Point Operations Per Second, or GFLOPS. All single-precision calculations are performed by stream processors or CUDA cores, therefore the more cores / processors the graphics unit has the better. Performance also depends on the processor clock speed. The Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3 graphics card is a bit faster here. Higher single-precision performance number means the GPU will perform better in general computing applications. Since CUDA cores or stream processors are also used as vertex and geometry shaders for 3D image generation, higher performance is also beneficial to games.
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)
300 240 180 120 60 0 |
|||||
| |||||
Higher is better
Memory bandwidth of both graphics cards is identical.
- Inno3D GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X2
- Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3
Specs comparison
All rows with different specifications or features are highlighted.
General information | ||
Market segment | Desktop | |
Manufacturer | Inno3D | |
Model | GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X2 | iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3 |
Part number | N106F-2SDN- | C1060-4SDN- |
Based on | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
Architecture / Interface | ||
Die name | ||
Architecture | ||
Fabrication process | ||
Bus interface | ||
Cores / shaders | ||
CUDA cores | ||
ROPs | ||
Pixel fill rate | ||
Texture units | ||
Texture fill rate | ||
Single Precision performance | ||
Clocks / Memory | ||
Base clock | 1506 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Boost clock | ||
Memory size | 6144 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Memory clock | ||
Memory interface width | ||
Memory bandwidth | ||
Other features | ||
Maximum power |
Better values / features are marked with green color, and worse values are in red color.
Detailed specifications:
- Inno3D GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X2 (N106F-2SDN-N5GS)
- Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3 (C1060-4SDN-N5GNX)
Compare graphics cards
More comparisons
Compare Inno3D GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X2:
Compare Inno3D iChill GeForce GTX 1060 6GB X3: